En los círculos reformados, la mayoría sostiene la doctrina de la Generación Eterna (GE). Adoptar esta posición simplemente porque es parte de los credos (Niceno, Atanasiano, Calcedoniano) o de las confesiones (CFW, CBLF), sin ninguna evidencia exegética bíblica o sin un estudio minucioso de las Escrituras, equivale a tratar los credos y las confesiones como superiores a la Palabra de Dios. ¡Dios no lo permita! Recuerde que los teóricos de la GE definen su posición como un a

Para entender la ontología divina o al Único Dios Verdadero, uno puede revisar un texto a menudo descuidado, comúnmente conocido como idem per idem, porque subraya al SEÑOR como el Ser que “Es” o “YO SOY EL QUE SOY” en Éxodo 3:14 [LXX: egō eimi + ὁ ōn; Heb. hayah asher hayah]. Debido a que el autor usó Hayah [verbo hebreo semejante al griego Eimi, y conjugado como un imperfecto de primera persona] + el participio articulado ὁ ōn, uno puede ver fácilmente por qué muchos exeget

The following Christological exegesis of Philippians 2:5–8 is excerpted from my book, Polemical Apologetics: How to Defend Sola Scriptura Amid Anti-Christian Attacks (by Sonny Hernandez). 39-second excerpt (kenosis) Before reading the succinct exegesis of Philippians 2:5–8 below, it is vital to understand why a high Pauline view of Christology in these verses is critical. Rather than safeguarding the bodily existence of the Son as truly God, ill-advised readers often presuppo

2 Corinthians 5:21, KJV - For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him. The following link provides access to my high-christological exegesis of the hypostatic union. Introduction Historically, many Free Grace Radio constituents lauded Don Fortner as a gifted interlocutor and beloved pastor, praising his firm exposition of the particular death of Christ. Amid these teachings, however, some have overlooked—eithe

By Sonny Hernandez To understand divine ontology or the One True God, one may review an often neglected text, commonly known as ' idem...

Also, review the following video: Rejecting Eternal Generation of the Son In Reformed circles, most hold to the doctrine of Eternal Generation (EG). Adopting this view merely because it is creedal (Nicene, Athanasian, Chalcedonian) or confessional (WCF, LBCF) without any biblical exegetical evidence or scrupulous study of Scripture is tantamount to treating creeds and confessions as superior to the Word of God. God forbid! Remember, EG theoreticians define their view as an et

I addressed the point of this post in my book, Fully Coequal Trinity in the Comma Johanneum: An Exegetical Review and Defense of 1 John...

By Sonny Hernandez The multi-personality of God and the coessential deity of Christ, God the Logos, are essentials of the Christian...

By Sonny Hernandez Unitarians reject the Tri-personality of the one true God, the preexistence of the Son, the dual nature of Christ, God...